Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTichý, Ondřej
dc.contributor.authorUlrych, Lukas
dc.contributor.authorŠmídl, Václav
dc.contributor.authorEvangeliou, Nikolaos
dc.contributor.authorStohl, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-07T12:47:18Z
dc.date.available2021-01-07T12:47:18Z
dc.date.created2020-12-07T12:45:45Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationGeoscientific Model Development. 2020, 13, 5917-5934.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1991-959X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2722026
dc.description.abstractEstimation of the temporal profile of an atmospheric release, also called the source term, is an important problem in environmental sciences. The problem can be formalized as a linear inverse problem wherein the unknown source term is optimized to minimize the difference between the measurements and the corresponding model predictions. The problem is typically ill-posed due to low sensor coverage of a release and due to uncertainties, e.g., in measurements or atmospheric transport modeling; hence, all state-of-the-art methods are based on some form of regularization of the problem using additional information. We consider two kinds of additional information: the prior source term, also known as the first guess, and regularization parameters for the shape of the source term. While the first guess is based on information independent of the measurements, such as the physics of the potential release or previous estimations, the regularization parameters are often selected by the designers of the optimization procedure. In this paper, we provide a sensitivity study of two inverse methodologies on the choice of the prior source term and regularization parameters of the methods. The sensitivity is studied in two cases: data from the European Tracer Experiment (ETEX) using FLEXPART v8.1 and the caesium-134 and caesium-137 dataset from the Chernobyl accident using FLEXPART v10.3.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleOn the tuning of atmospheric inverse methods: comparisons with the European Tracer Experiment (ETEX) and Chernobyl datasets using the atmospheric transport model FLEXPARTen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) 2020.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber5917-5934en_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalGeoscientific Model Developmenten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/gmd-13-5917-2020
dc.identifier.cristin1856930
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal