Comparison of diffusive and active sampling methods for the determination of nitrogen dioxide in urban air.

dc.contributor.author	Røyset, Oddvar
dc.date.accessioned	2021-06-29T10:33:23Z
dc.date.available	2021-06-29T10:33:23Z
dc.date.issued	1996
dc.identifier.isbn	82-425-0834-8
dc.identifier.issn	0807-7185
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2762079
dc.description.abstract	The NO/NO,-monitor and the iodide method are compared with a diffusional sampler for the sampling and determination of nitrogen dioxide in urban air. The results for the diffusional sampler were within 20% of the two other methods for weekly averages. The iodide method and the NO/NO,-monitor showed good agreement; the deviation was within 5%.
dc.language.iso	eng
dc.publisher	NILU
dc.relation.ispartof	NILU TR
dc.relation.ispartofseries	NILU TR; 24/96
dc.subject	Prøvetakere
dc.subject	Byluft
dc.subject	Nitrogendioksid
dc.title	Comparison of diffusive and active sampling methods for the determination of nitrogen dioxide in urban air.
dc.type	Research report
dc.rights.holder	© NILU
dc.source.issue	24/96
dc.relation.project	NILU:95042

Tekniske rapporter (1970-2014) [389]
Rapporter i de avsluttede seriene Teknisk notat og Teknisk rapport (NILU TN og NILU TR).