Comparison of diffusive and active sampling methods for the determination of nitrogen dioxide in urban air.
dc.contributor.author | Røyset, Oddvar | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-29T10:33:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-29T10:33:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1996 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 82-425-0834-8 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0807-7185 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2762079 | |
dc.description.abstract | The NO/NO,-monitor and the iodide method are compared with a diffusional sampler for the sampling and determination of nitrogen dioxide in urban air. The results for the diffusional sampler were within 20% of the two other methods for weekly averages. The iodide method and the NO/NO,-monitor showed good agreement; the deviation was within 5%. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | NILU | |
dc.relation.ispartof | NILU TR | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | NILU TR; 24/96 | |
dc.subject | Prøvetakere | |
dc.subject | Byluft | |
dc.subject | Nitrogendioksid | |
dc.title | Comparison of diffusive and active sampling methods for the determination of nitrogen dioxide in urban air. | |
dc.type | Research report | |
dc.rights.holder | © NILU | |
dc.source.issue | 24/96 | |
dc.relation.project | NILU:95042 |
Tilhørende fil(er)
Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)
-
Tekniske rapporter (1970-2014) [389]
Rapporter i de avsluttede seriene Teknisk notat og Teknisk rapport (NILU TN og NILU TR).