Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSkulberg, Knut Ragnvald
dc.contributor.authorNyrud, Anders Q.
dc.contributor.authorGoffeng, Lars Ole
dc.contributor.authorWisthaler, Armin
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T08:00:08Z
dc.date.available2020-01-09T08:00:08Z
dc.date.created2019-09-25T09:11:33Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2297-3362
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2635436
dc.description.abstractAs a natural, biological material, wood emits various organic chemical substances, mostly volatile organic compounds (VOCs), very volatile organic compounds (VVOCs) and formaldehyde. When such emissions occur in indoor spaces, concentrations of these substances are higher than concentrations outdoors. Consequently, the level of emissions from building materials are of relevance in relation to their possible health effects. The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that exposure to VOCs from Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) might increase mucous membrane symptoms and/or general symptoms, compared to exposure to VOCs from Norway spruce (Picea abies). The study was carried out as a double-blinded, crossover, randomized, controlled trial. The health indicators were measured using objective and subjective methods. The VOC exposure was measured with a proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Thirty healthy individuals participated. The mean concentration of CO2 inside the chamber in each session varied between 420 ppm and 533 ppm. The temperature and RH varied between 21.5°C and 23.7°C and 12.0% and 24.2%. Ozone was supplied via ventilated outdoor air. The median concentration in outdoor air was 23 μg/m3 (13 ppb). The study was conducted with a statistically significant difference in the exposure to VOCs between the experimental (pine) exposure and the control (spruce) exposure. The mean concentrations of VOCs during the experimental exposure were methanol (31 ppb), acetaldehyde (8 ppb), formic acid (11 ppb), acetone/propanal (14 ppb), acetic acid (14 ppb) and monoterpenes (172 ppb). No difference in health outcome was revealed between the experimental and the control exposure. No inflammatory reactions or sensory irritation were found with exposure to 172 ppb monoterpenes and a low ozone concentration. Low relative humidity may have increased eye blinking in the participants in both exposure situations.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleHealth and Exposure to VOCs From Pinewood in Indoor Environmentsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holder© 2019 Skulberg, Nyrud, Goffeng and Wisthalernb_NO
dc.source.volume5nb_NO
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Built Environmentnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fbuil.2019.00107
dc.identifier.cristin1728646
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 216404nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7460,0,0,0
cristin.unitnameNILU - Norsk institutt for luftforskning
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal