Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEvangeliou, Nikolaos
dc.contributor.authorTichý, Ondřej
dc.contributor.authorEckhardt, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorZwaaftink, Christine Groot
dc.contributor.authorBrahney, Janice
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T10:51:29Z
dc.date.available2022-03-21T10:51:29Z
dc.date.created2022-03-18T10:30:53Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Hazardous Materials. 2022, 432, 128585.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0304-3894
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2986408
dc.description.abstractWe combine observations from Western USA and inverse modelling to constrain global atmospheric emissions of microplastics (MPs) and microfibers (MFs). The latter are used further to model their global atmospheric dynamics. Global annual MP emissions were calculated as 9.6 ± 3.6 Tg and MF emissions as 6.5 ± 2.9 Tg. Global average monthly MP concentrations were 47 ng m-3 and 33 ng m-3 for MFs, at maximum. The largest deposition of agricultural MPs occurred close to the world’s largest agricultural regions. Road MPs mostly deposited in the East Coast of USA, Central Europe, and Southeastern Asia; MPs resuspended with mineral dust near Sahara and Middle East. Only 1.8% of the emitted mass of oceanic MPs was transferred to land, and 1.4% of land MPs to ocean; the rest were deposited in the same environment. Previous studies reported that 0.74–1.9 Tg y-1 of land-based atmospheric MPs/MFs (< 5 mm) are transported to the ocean, while riverine transport is between 3.3 and 14 Tg y-1. We calculate that 0.418 ± 0.201 Tg y-1 MPs/MFs (size up to 250 and 2500 µm) were transported from the land to ocean (large particles were ignored). Model validation against observations showed that particle removal must be urgently updated in global models.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSources and fate of atmospheric microplastics revealed from inverse and dispersion modelling: From global emissions to depositionen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.source.volume432en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Hazardous Materialsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128585
dc.identifier.cristin2010764
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 275407en_US
dc.relation.projectNILU - Norsk institutt for luftforskning: 118063en_US
dc.source.articlenumber128585en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal