Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorElespuru, Rosalie K.
dc.contributor.authorDoak, Shareen H.
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Andrew Richard
dc.contributor.authorDusinska, Maria
dc.contributor.authorPfuhler, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorManjanatha, Mugamane
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Renato M.S.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Connie L.
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-04T08:54:08Z
dc.date.available2022-07-04T08:54:08Z
dc.date.created2022-06-14T09:16:46Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Toxicology. 2022, 4, 859122.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3002535
dc.description.abstractGenotoxicity testing is performed to determine potential hazard of a chemical or agent for direct or indirect DNA interaction. Testing may be a surrogate for assessment of heritable genetic risk or carcinogenic risk. Testing of nanomaterials (NM) for hazard identification is generally understood to require a departure from normal testing procedures found in international standards and guidelines. A critique of the genotoxicity literature in Elespuru et al., 2018, reinforced evidence of problems with genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials (NM) noted by many previously. A follow-up to the critique of problems (what is wrong) is a series of methods papers in this journal designed to provide practical information on what is appropriate (right) in the performance of genotoxicity assays altered for NM assessment. In this “Common Considerations” paper, general considerations are addressed, including NM characterization, sample preparation, dosing choice, exposure assessment (uptake) and data analysis that are applicable to any NM genotoxicity assessment. Recommended methods for specific assays are presented in a series of additional papers in this special issue of the journal devoted to toxicology methods for assessment of nanomaterials: the In vitro Micronucleus Assay, TK Mutagenicity assays, and the In vivo Comet Assay. In this context, NM are considered generally as insoluble particles or test articles in the nanometer size range that present difficulties in assessment using techniques described in standards such as OECD guidelines.en_US
dc.description.abstractCommon Considerations for Genotoxicity Assessment of Nanomaterialsen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCommon Considerations for Genotoxicity Assessment of Nanomaterialsen_US
dc.title.alternativeCommon Considerations for Genotoxicity Assessment of Nanomaterialsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 Elespuru, Doak, Collins, Dusinska, Pfuhler, Manjanatha, Cardoso and Chen.en_US
dc.source.volume4en_US
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Toxicologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/ftox.2022.859122
dc.identifier.cristin2031634
dc.source.articlenumber859122en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal