Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHoang, Nguyen Tien
dc.contributor.authorTaherzadeh, Oliver
dc.contributor.authorOhashi, Haruka
dc.contributor.authorYonekura, Yusuke
dc.contributor.authorNishijima, Shota
dc.contributor.authorYamabe, Masaki
dc.contributor.authorMatsui, Testuya
dc.contributor.authorMatsuda, Hiroyuki
dc.contributor.authorMoran, Daniel Dean
dc.contributor.authorKanemoto, Keiichiro
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-07T10:46:24Z
dc.date.available2023-06-07T10:46:24Z
dc.date.created2023-05-31T15:15:59Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationPNAS. 120, e220837612.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3070332
dc.description.abstractDemand for food products, often from international trade, has brought agricultural land use into direct competition with biodiversity. Where these potential conflicts occur and which consumers are responsible is poorly understood. By combining conservation priority (CP) maps with agricultural trade data, we estimate current potential conservation risk hotspots driven by 197 countries across 48 agricultural products. Globally, a third of agricultural production occurs in sites of high CP (CP > 0.75, max = 1.0). While cattle, maize, rice, and soybean pose the greatest threat to very high-CP sites, other low-conservation risk products (e.g., sugar beet, pearl millet, and sunflower) currently are less likely to be grown in sites of agri-culture–conservation conflict. Our analysis suggests that a commodity can cause dissimilar conservation threats in different production regions. Accordingly, some of the conservation risks posed by different countries depend on their demand and sourcing patterns of agricultural commodities. Our spatial analyses identify potential hotspots of competition between agriculture and high-conservation value sites (i.e., 0.5° resolution, or ~367 to 3,077km2, grid cells containing both agriculture and high-biodiversity priority habitat), thereby providing additional information that could help prioritize conservation activities and safeguard biodiversity in individual countries and globally. A web-based GIS tool at https://agriculture.spatialfootprint.com/biodiversity/ systematically visualizes the results of our analyses.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservationen_US
dc.title.alternativeMapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservationen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.en_US
dc.source.volume120en_US
dc.source.journalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Americaen_US
dc.source.issue23en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.2208376120
dc.identifier.cristin2150515
dc.source.articlenumbere220837612en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal