Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSerafini, Melania Maria
dc.contributor.authorSepheri, Sara
dc.contributor.authorMidali, Miriam
dc.contributor.authorStinckens, Marth
dc.contributor.authorBiesiekierska, Marta
dc.contributor.authorWolniakowska, Anna
dc.contributor.authorGatzios, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorRundén-Pran, Elise
dc.contributor.authorReszka, Edyta
dc.contributor.authorMarinovich, Marina
dc.contributor.authorVanhaecke, Tamara
dc.contributor.authorRoszak, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorViviani, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorTanima, SenGupta
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-09T08:46:19Z
dc.date.available2024-04-09T08:46:19Z
dc.date.created2024-04-08T13:10:20Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Toxicology. 2024, 98, 1271-1295.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0340-5761
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3125443
dc.description.abstractAdult neurotoxicity (ANT) and developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) assessments aim to understand the adverse effects and underlying mechanisms of toxicants on the human nervous system. In recent years, there has been an increasing focus on the so-called new approach methodologies (NAMs). The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), together with European and American regulatory agencies, promote the use of validated alternative test systems, but to date, guidelines for regulatory DNT and ANT assessment rely primarily on classical animal testing. Alternative methods include both non-animal approaches and test systems on non-vertebrates (e.g., nematodes) or non-mammals (e.g., fish). Therefore, this review summarizes the recent advances of NAMs focusing on ANT and DNT and highlights the potential and current critical issues for the full implementation of these methods in the future. The status of the DNT in vitro battery (DNT IVB) is also reviewed as a first step of NAMs for the assessment of neurotoxicity in the regulatory context. Critical issues such as (i) the need for test batteries and method integration (from in silico and in vitro to in vivo alternatives, e.g., zebrafish, C. elegans) requiring interdisciplinarity to manage complexity, (ii) interlaboratory transferability, and (iii) the urgent need for method validation are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleRecent advances and current challenges of new approach methodologies in developmental and adult neurotoxicity testingen_US
dc.title.alternativeRecent advances and current challenges of new approach methodologies in developmental and adult neurotoxicity testingen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2024en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1271-1295en_US
dc.source.volume98en_US
dc.source.journalArchives of Toxicologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00204-024-03703-8
dc.identifier.cristin2259835
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/952404en_US
dc.relation.projectNILU: 120152en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal